Policy Matters
Blog Home All Blogs
Administered by the Blog Committee, Policy Matters posts are written by members on a variety of topics. From think pieces to how-to's, editorials to news round-ups, there is something for every policy administrator. Interested in contributing a post? Let us know by emailing admin@acupa.org.

 

Search all posts for:   

 

Top tags: policy  policy development  Policy Administration  Jessica Teets  policy process  collaboration  Deborah Bartlett  pandemic  accessibility  COVID-19  Jennifer Gallagher  Gina Kennedy  writing  ACUPA  data  equity  IT  Productivity  remote work  How-to  Lisa Biagas  news  resources  Sara Gigeroff  students  AI  change  compliance  culture  free speech 

Are Your Policies Accessible?

Posted By Jennifer Gallagher, Utah Valley University, Monday, June 17, 2019

Part 1: An Introduction to Web Accessibility

Think about your institution's policies and how they are published digitally: Can the text be highlighted word for word? Do they include hot links with meaningful text? Do your logos and images include alt text? Were they formatted and designed using styles? If not, your policies may be inaccessible to many of the students, staff, faculty, and visitors to your institution's website.

This post will cover the basics of web accessibility as it pertains to our roles as policy administrators. My next post will dive deeper into accessibility and how you can utilize built-in Microsoft Word tools to generate, efficiently and quickly, documents that translate into fully accessible web and digital content.

Why We Should Care about Accessibility

Web accessibility is one of the most critical issues facing higher education today. New web technologies have been a boon for distance and online education, yet 11% of undergraduates have a disability that impairs access to websites and other online and digital content. Many of us who live without such impairments rarely consider if the documents and digital content we create can be read using a screen reader for someone with a visual disability or navigated with voice software for those unable to use a mouse and keyboard. This is why the World Wide Web Consortium, better known as W3C, created the Web Accessibility Initiative. Under this initiative are standards to make sure the internet can easily be used by as many people as possible. These standards are referred to as the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) and have become the universally accepted resource for maintaining optimal web accessibility.

While WCAG guidelines and web accessibility may seem daunting, it costs significantly less time and resources to make a site accessible than it does to procure the lawyer to protect you in an accessibility claim. In recent years, thousands of complaints have been filed and fines levied against institutions of higher education for failing to provide equal access to digital resources and education.

However, the issue of accessibility extends beyond legal obligations. While laws such as the Americans with Disabilities Act exist to protect individuals with disabilities and ensure equal access to the same resources as everyone else, ensuring that all users have access to the policies of your institution is critical for both themselves and the community, and well—it’s the right thing to do. We, as the creators and curators of the laws and standards that govern our institutions, have a special responsibility to affirm our commitment to serving the needs of every member of our communities. If we expect every individual to abide by the policies and guidelines we establish, we must ensure every individual is able to find, access, and understand the documents and digital content our offices produce and publish.

The Basics of Web Accessibility

The WCAG 2.0 consists of 12 guidelines with four arching principles: Perceivable, Operable, Understandable, and Robust (POUR). These principles and guidelines relate to one simple question: can the users with varying degree of ability ingest the content on your site? Remembering the principles of POUR when creating documents can help your policies to be accessibility-ready and avoid having to make time-consuming corrections in the future. These principles are explained in detail below:

Perceivable

The content needs to be presented in different ways, including assistive technologies, without losing its meaning. The easiest way to do so is by providing alt-text for non-text content. The content should be easier to see and hear.

Operable

This principle ensures that the content is easy to operate upon. Web accessibility issues are not synonymous with visibility issues, as is the popular myth. They are as much a problem for people with hearing disability as for a person with a neurological or cognitive disorder. The content on the website needs to be accessible with a keyboard for people with limited motor functions, people with color blindness, and avoiding the use of content and types that cause seizure.

Understandable

Is the text readable for people with difference in visual ability? This principle ensures that the content appears and operates in a predictable way. This specifically focuses on the issues related to color contrast.

Robust

Any content—written or multimedia—should be future proof. Efforts should be made to maximize compatibility with current and future user tools. Before the dawn of the 21st century, screen readers were not as popular as they are 18 years later. A decade back even mobile phones were not as ubiquitous.

Moving Forward

Now that we understand the guiding principles, we are in a better position to deliver a better user experience to all. One thing worth highlighting: accessibility issues are easier to address before they manifest on your policies and documents, not after. My next post will cover simple steps you can take while writing policies and creating other documents and templates to ensure your documents translate to accessibility-compliant digital and web content from the start.

Now, I would like to hear from you. Is your institution currently facing any issues with accessibility? Do your digital policy documents already apply accessibility standards? And does your institution already have a policy regarding accessibility?

Tags:  accessibility  Jennifer Gallagher 

PermalinkComments (1)
 

ACUPA Website Features

Posted By Joshua Adams, Cornell University, Tuesday, May 14, 2019

Getting the Most Out of ACUPA Forums and Blogs

To satisfy your desire for a blog post describing some of the features of our website, my next few posts will address a bit of what is offered at acupa.org.

Blogs and forums have the same purpose, to promote communication between members and share information. However, the order and structure of communication is different between the two. They also differ in how you are notified that someone has posted to a forum or blog.

Forums

Forums are threaded ongoing discussions. Any member in good standing can begin a new topic in a forum, or post a comment in any forum discussion. By default, the latest post displays at the top of the list within a forum. Replies within a forum topic are sorted chronologically, so the most recent reply always appears at the bottom. Forums allow for internal quoting and the member’s profile photo is displayed in their forum posts.

The best way to stay on top of discussions in the forums is to subscribe to those that interest you. You can subscribe to get instant updates in your email anytime a forum has a new post. Or, you can subscribe to the digest, which will email you no more than once per day when a forum has a new post. To learn how to set up your forum subscriptions, hover over the “Forums” option in the top navigation and click on “Forums: How-to” from the drop-down menu.

Blogs

Blogs are always organized so that the latest post is at the top of the page, regardless of the addition of comments. Blogs do not pull member profile pictures, but do link to the posting member’s profile. The site-wide blog, to which all members are subscribed, is called Policy Matters. You receive an email notice whenever a new blog is posted. If you would also like an email notice about any comments made on the post, follow these steps from the Policy Matters screen: 1) Click on “Manage Subscriptions,” 2) Click on the speech bubble icon so that it turns green.

Currently, only members of the Blog Committee can post to Policy Matters, but if you would like to write a blog post, the committee would be happy to publish it for you on the Policy Matters blog. If you are interested, please contact Jessica Teets at teets@purdue.edu

Tags:  blog  Collaboration  forums  How-to  website 

PermalinkComments (0)
 

"Operation Varsity Blues": High Stakes Testing in College Admissions

Posted By Megan Jones, Metropolitan State University of Denver, Monday, April 15, 2019

When Headlines Highlight an Admissions Conundrum


**The views expressed in this article are my personal views and do not represent the official position of MSU Denver or ACUPA.**

In an episode of Cops meets Desperate Housewives, FBI agents escorted Felicity Huffman from her Hollywood Hills home with guns drawn. Huffman reportedly pled guilty to paying $15,000 disguised as a donation to a test proctor to falsify her daughter’s SAT scores after paying an additional $250,000 in bond, suggesting the price of admission has gone up. While critics argue that standardized tests, such as the SATs and ACTs, do more to uphold cultural and economic hegemonies than to promote student success,1  many colleges still require standardized testing to decide admission of applicants. Dubbed “Operation Varsity Blues” by the FBI, this situation once again raises the question if standardized testing is a valid factor in college admissions.

Metropolitan State University of Denver’s student-retention data suggests that a student’s grade point average (GPA) is a better predictor of student success than a standardized test score, said MSU Denver Director of Recruitment Morgan Raleigh, M.A. “A high GPA suggests that a student is capable of succeeding over time rather than at one point in time,” said Raleigh, a trait necessary for persistence to graduation and launching a career.

Yet, a recent request from a parent of a home-schooled student with a 4.0 GPA to waive MSU Denver’s test-score requirement brought up MSU Denver’s standardized test policy. The parent did not want her daughter to participate in standardized testing as a matter of ethical principle. Vive la résistance!

With its open-access mission, MSU Denver’s approach to standardized testing is flexible. According to State of Colorado statute, MSU Denver admits anyone age 20 and older who holds a high school diploma or equivalent. Applicants age 19 and under are reviewed holistically. For instance, if a student has a low ACT score but shows other indicators of success, the student will likely be admitted. From a policy standpoint, having multiple factors to make admissions decisions by seems key.

“More and more schools [like MSU Denver] are moving towards using self-reported info from students to determine admission,” said MSU Denver Executive Director of Admissions and Outreach Vaughn Toland, M.A. “National research has shown that self-reported info, such as GPA and test scores, is at least 96% accurate.”

Being open access, however, is not without its challenges. MSU Denver continues to develop supplemental instruction programs, such as stretch versions of English composition and algebra, along with peer mentoring for classes with high drop/withdraw/failure (DWF) rates, to support students who need extra help with fundamentals like writing and math.

“We are defined not by who we exclude, but by who we include,” said MSU Denver President Janine Davidson, Ph.D., at her presidential inauguration.

_________________________________________________

1 Starr, J. (2017). The paradox of standardized testing. Phi Delta Kappan 99 (3), 72-73.

Tags:  ACTs  admission  open access  SATs  standardized test  student retention 

PermalinkComments (0)
 

The Robots are Coming​

Posted By Teresa Raetz, Georgia Gwinnett College, Monday, April 1, 2019

 

The Impact of Automation and AI

 

One aspect of my job is to research emerging issues for my campus and make recommendations for how we should be preparing for them.  This post evolved from a policy and practice brief I recently wrote for my institution on the role of automation and artificial intelligence (AI) on the economy and the subsequent challenges for how we prepare students and operate as an organization. 

 

While campus traditions and cultures vary, most of us have experiencedand currently work inan educational system that prepares workers for an Industrial Revolution-based economy.  Our modern economy, however, is changing in ways that will likely affect both the way we prepare students and our own workplaces; one of the drivers of that change is automation and AI

 

Most people are familiar with the impact of automation on factory and blue-collar jobs that began to speed up in the 1970s.  What many don’t appreciate is that increasing numbers of white-collar professions, such as radiology, accounting, stock trading, paralegal work, and even some aspects of journalism, have already been significantly influenced by machines that can do the work as effectively as humans.[i]  Yes, some of the news stories you are currently reading are written by nonhumans.  A 2013 Oxford University study predicted that nearly half of all jobs will be in danger of automation in the next two decades,[ii] and a 2015 McKinsey report predicted that 45% of all work can be automated by technology that’s currently available.[iii]A survey found that most researchers believe that AI systems will probably (i.e., more than 50% likelihood) achieve the ability to work at the same level as humans beginning around 2040.[iv]  Even more moderate predictions see a large impact on the workplace, with 9% of the workforce being displaced.[v]

 

Skeptics say that the world economy has previously experienced several major technological disruptions—such as the power loom that displaced weavers and the car that eliminated most of the relevant products and services for horse-drawn carriagesand each time the economy recovered as people reskilled. Several experts say, however, that the disruption caused by AI is different because it is exponential in its ability to change and adjust.[vi]

 

Even if the more dire predictions don’t come to pass, it’s certain that AI and automation will impact our lives as workers, as well as those of our graduatesWhile it’s unlikely that instruction and service units will be completely automated, technology is currently in use that automates important functions like grading, tutoring, and answering basic inquiries from students. 

 

Because so much is unknown about the impact of AI on education, there are more questions than answers at this point, but it’s important, nevertheless, that campuses begin to engage these coming changes and, as part of that process, give thoughtful consideration to what they mean for our own campuses as workplaces.  Has your institution begun thinking about these issues?  Has your institution begun using AI to perform functions that were previously done by humans, such as chatbots to answer basic student questions? In an era of scarce budget resources, what stance, if any, does your campus take on preserving the jobs of human workers versus using technology that can perform some or all of their functions?What policy and ethical implications do you foresee, as AI becomes more integrated into the work of education?

 



[i] No author. (2016, June 25a). Automation and anxiety: Will smarter machines cause mass unemployment? The Economist. Retrieved from https://www.economist.com/special-report/2016/06/25/automation-and-anxiety; Giacomelli, G. & Shukla, P. (2017). Does automation mean job losses for accountants? Accounting Today. Retrieved from https://www.accountingtoday.com/opinion/does-automation-mean-job-losses-for-accountants

 

[ii] Frey, C. B. & Osborne, M. A. (2017). The future of employment: How susceptible are jobs to computerization? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 114, 254 – 280.

 

[iii] Chui, M., Manyika, J., & Miremadi, M. (2015, November). Four fundamentals of workplace automation.  McKinsey Quarterly. Retrieved from https://www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/digital-mckinsey/our-insights/four-fundamentals-of-workplace-automation

 

[iv] Müller, V. & Bostrom, N. (2014). Future progress in artificial intelligence: A survey of expert opinion. In V. C. Müller (ed.), Fundamental Issues of Artificial Intelligence (555 – 574). Berlin: Springer. 

 

[v] Arntz, M. Gregory, T, & Zierahn, U. (2016). The risk of automation for jobs in OECD countries: A comparative analysis. OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers, 189. Paris: OECD Publishing. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/5jlz9h56dvq7-en

 

[vi] Maguire, E. and OliverC. (Hosts). (2017, July 11). Keeping up with the technologies – what is exponential tech and how can we prepare for constant change? [Audio podcast].  Retrieved from https://tech2025.com/2017/07/11/episode-3-keeping-up-with-the-technologies-what-is-exponential-tech/; Swedish Educational Broadcasting Company (Producer) & Sjostrom, M. (Director). (2016). Automation and the future of jobs [Video file]. Retrieved from https://www.amazon.com/Automation-Future-Jobs-Keith-Foster/dp/B06X41LK34

 

Tags:  AI  Artificial intelligence  automation  change  chatbot  workplace 

PermalinkComments (1)
 

The Joining of Two Community Colleges

Posted By Meg Resue, Rowan College at Gloucester County, Monday, March 18, 2019

Merging Policies into One Manual


Before I move on to my blog topic, I wanted to take a moment to thank Cara O’Sullivan on behalf of the Blog Committee. Cara was one of the first members of the committee when it began as a newsletter in 2013. She took on a lead role in the committee by putting together the production schedule for each issue and editing each of the articles before they went to press. She was enthusiastic about communicating to other ACUPA members through the newsletter and championed the switch to the blog format. With too many obligations on her plate, Cara decided that she needed to step down from the committee, and while we understand her decision, we are sorry to lose her. Thank you, Cara, for contributing your writing and editing skills to ACUPA for the past six years!

On another note, we are pleased to announce the addition of Teresa Raetz from Georgia Gwinnett College to the Blog Committee. We all can look forward to her expertise and perspective on policy in the coming months.

Now on to my blog topic . . .

Transformational change at a higher education institution is complex, and on the road to that change the details are endless.

Over the course of several years, the leadership of the community college where I work participated in many discussions with a neighboring community college on the idea of joining the two entities. The rationale made economic sense and served to provide a broader array of academic opportunities for students in the state’s southern region. The plan would have our college act as the main campus and the other as a branch. After extensive communication opportunities to vet the jointure with external and internal stakeholders from both locales, the leadership drafted a memorandum of understanding to explore and move forward toward a jointure early last year. This action triggered the early notification of the plan to our accrediting agency in March 2018, with the submittal of a complex substantive change request form and first run of documents occurring in August. The timeline for final decision from the agency is June 27, 2019. On June 28th, the soon-to-be branch campus board of trustees is scheduled to meet to approve closure of their college, to be followed by a meeting on July 1 for the reorganization of our board of trustees, and then the vote to approve opening as one college with two campus locations under a new name. Although accreditation approval is in no way a given, both colleges have needed to plan accordingly pending this approval. So, full steam ahead toward transformational change.

Since the submission of the substantive change last year, thousands of pages of documentation have been provided to the accrediting agency, getting into the weeds regarding the handling of finances, facilities, academics, student services, athletics, faculty and staff contracts, and POLICY. The latter is where I come in as the responsible party for the management of the policy office as it exists today, and how it will look and operate with two locations as of July 1.

In preparation for the official jointure, it is necessary to have a course of action to review, compare, and consolidate the policy of both institutions into a best practice, with one comprehensive policy manual providing governance solidarity for the main and branch campuses that would be ready to adopt on July 1.

To facilitate this process a policy committee was established to draft the initial merged policy manual. The committee was comprised of a chair, one representative from each location, a policy consultant, and as needed, legal representation.

The process for analyzing the institutions’ policies has involved a side-by-side comparison of both policy manual sections for content. This resulted in a walk-over analysis to determine policy redundancy, as well as discover those areas strengthened by best practice as a result of policy comparison, all with sensitivity toward adaptation of location specific language as warranted.

 

To keep the policy review process on track, it was imperative to have a fluid timeline spread over seven months from November 2018 through May 30, 2019. This gave the policy committee the month of June for final review by both locations for any last minute adjustments. Throughout this process, the accreditors have required periodic updates on progress toward the goal of a merged policy manual. As a matter of fact, the policy office has been asked to upload all additional draft policies that were ready by Thursday of last week. The policy office is in a good place; we are ahead of schedule.

 

As I transition through the jointure of these two colleges, I have found this type of transformational change to be a fascinating experience, and there is more yet to come.

Tags:  Community college  transformation 

PermalinkComments (1)
 

Customize Your Microsoft Word Experience

Posted By Jennifer Gallagher, Utah Valley University, Monday, March 4, 2019

Tips to Help Word Work for You


Note: This is the first lesson in a planned, ongoing series of posts based on expressed interest and requests from this post. In future posts in this series, previous lessons will be linked at the bottom for easy reference.

To say that Word is highly customizable is a gross understatement. You can, if desired, change every menu, toolbar, and command used by Word. You can change the way its interface looks, the way the program itself operates, how it reacts to every keystroke, and so much more. Customizing Word according to how you utilize it can save countless hours and increase both in-house and external user experience.

However, because it would be impossible to cover all the ways in which Word can be customized in a single post, this and each subsequent lesson will focus on one or two simple techniques you can implement to get the most bang for your buck in terms of usage and productivity. As always, leave a comment below with questions or suggestions for future topics.

Tip 1: Creating Custom Tabs and Buttons

When you first install Word, it comes pre-programmed with a few interface tabs. These tabs are located on the top bar of the screen—the ribbon—and include buttons pre-selected and organized by Microsoft according to the most common, basic usage of their program. If all you use Word for is creating simple, single-use documents, this basic ribbon likely meets your needs without sacrificing extra time fiddling with settings and menus. However, if you find yourself creating and recreating similar documents, repeating the same series of button strokes and actions, searching through menus or toolbars to alter settings or styles, or regularly completing other repetitive, time-consuming tasks, you may benefit from customizing your ribbon to better work for you.

Creating custom tabs allows you to organize the tools you need and use most often. (Later in this series, I will discuss how to program your own custom tools to complete simple, multi-step tasks with just the push of a button, but for now, I’ll stick to the basics). While customizing your ribbon, you are likely to discover and unlock some of the hidden features already programmed into Word. Along with buttons for highly specialized-use features are basic buttons that simply reduce the amount of clicks it takes you to get to a desired style or setting. For example, my office uses some of the advanced review features already programmed into Word but nested in a series of buttons and menus in the default ribbon. By including these commands as a button in a custom tab created for editorial review, we can skip the menu hopping and tell Word what to do with one click instead.

How to Customize the Ribbon in Microsoft Word

This feature works the same in all modern versions of Microsoft Word: 2010, 2013, and 2016, as well as in other Office applications, such as Excel, PowerPoint, Publisher, etc.

  1. From the File menu, select Options. Then select Customize Ribbon. The list on the left will display all the buttons (or commands) already programmed into Word. The dropdown menu allows you to view commands based on their existing placement under a tab in the ribbon or their exclusion from the current ribbon. Take a moment to familiarize yourself with some of the commands available and figure out which ones will work the best for your needs. The list on the left displays the current tabs on the ribbon and allows you to create your own. Think of the tabs as a folder, commands as pages, and groups as dividers. Each page (command) you want to use needs to be placed in a new or existing folder (tab). These pages can then be subsequently linked together by subject and applicability by dividers (groups).
  2. Create a custom tab by selecting New Tab. Custom groups can be added to new or existing tabs by selecting the tab you want to place in the group and then clicking New Group. Groups must be placed under a new or existing tab. Select the newly created tab or group from the list and select Rename to give it a new name.
    Screen shot of the Customize Ribbon tab under Options
  3. To add a command to the new group, select the new group on the right, select a command on the left, and click Add. Commands must be placed in new or existing groups. From here, you can organize commands and groups under a tab by dragging them around the list. Once finished, select OK to save your custom tabs and exit the menu. Return to the document view screen to reveal your custom ribbon.
    Screen shot of Customize Ribbon tab, zoomed in to show Add and Remove buttons

Your ribbon can be customized in a variety of ways with commands and macros that eliminate extra clicks and steps for simple, repetitive tasks, saving you time and headaches in the process. The screenshot below is a mapping of one of my custom tabs to give you a better idea how this feature can be implemented for your own use:

Screen shot of Jennifer's customized ribbon in Word

Hopefully, you found this helpful and can implement some of these tricks in your own office. Let me know in the comments below if you have any questions, requests for topics, or can share some tricks and tips of your own.

Tags:  custom Word buttons  custom Word tabs  how-to instructions  Word ribbon 

PermalinkComments (2)
 

So, What Do You Do?

Posted By Jessica Teets CCEP, Purdue University, Monday, February 18, 2019
Updated: Monday, September 27, 2021

The Dreaded Conversation Stopper

The views expressed in this post are solely those of the author and do not represent the views of ACUPA or Purdue University.

I stole this title from a blog post by John Vasquez that I read in “Inside Higher Ed.” The title caught my eye, because it is a question that I dread. If I answer with, “I’m a policy administrator,” I get a blank stare and silence, as if the other person is still waiting for me to answer the question. Sometimes I answer, “I work in ethics and compliance.To which the other person responds with a knowing, “Oohhh,as if they are buying time while they think through all the rules they broke that day and wonder if I’m going to call them out on anything. Either answer tends to be a conversation stopper. 

This is one of the drawbacks to working in a relatively new industry. Only those of us who are policy administrators know what it means. Does the fact that others don’t understand what I do make my job less significant? At times, it feels like it does. When people are not able to relate to something, they disregard it. So, I wonder how I can answer the question about what I do that makes it more relatable to the uninitiated. 

Policies outline the rules and expectations for the university community. From a compliance perspective, policies are necessary for setting the tone of an employer’s culture. If the employer does not specify what is right and wrong and what employees can do to prevent wrong behavior, the employer will be hard pressed to say it has an ethical culture. As the person responsible for making sure that Purdue University’s policies are clear, reasonable, and current, I play a pretty big role in shaping its culture. 

Maybe the next time I’m asked what I do, I will answer with something along the lines of, “I help faculty, staff, and students understand what it means to be a Boilermaker.” Would that be a conversation starter?

Tags:  compliance  culture  policy administration 

PermalinkComments (4)
 

Where Does Your Policy Function Belong?

Posted By Joshua Adams, Cornell University, Monday, February 4, 2019
Updated: Wednesday, February 6, 2019

Reorganization of Policy Administration at Cornell


I am continually surprised by the different organizational placement of so many of our policy offices. When the ACUPA membership was surveyed, we found that organizational placement under executive administration or compliance/risk management made up more than half of those offices responding, with another 23% reporting through general counsel and finance.  The balance of the responding offices were in HR, academic/research, or various other areas, with no single one representing more than 6% of total responders.

Where do you report in your organization, and does it matter?  Is the success of institutional policy at your organization necessarily tied to any particular organizational structure, such as the existence of a central compliance function? Could you have any influence if you believed that your policy function needed to be moved in your organization in order to be successful? To whom would you appeal, if you did want to move your office to another organizational unit? These are the questions many of us ask ourselves, and ones I have asked myself regularly for well over twenty years. 

Here at Cornell University, the policy function began in 1989, when “higher education policy” was viewed skeptically, at best, and considered Orwellian by many. We were originally part of the internal audit office.  Within a few months, however, senior administration realized that this placement created a conflict of interest: the same individuals who were responsible for the process for developing the policies couldn’t objectively audit against them. So we looked for a new home.  Thankfully, we had a willing vice president for financial affairs, who took over responsibility for institutional policy.  And there we lived—until three weeks ago.

While I’m fairly certain it was not because of my long-held opinion that the university should consider moving the policy function out of the finance area, it appears as though this is the direction the university is headed.  A new chapter has begun for me at the university and, as of now, the policy office reports to the “associate vice president for EH&S and risk management,” a big title for a growing university unit.  Formerly just “Environmental Health and Safety” (EH&S), the unit expanded some months ago to include the area of risk management and insurance and, now, university policy. Cornell does not have a centralized compliance office, and I wonder if that might be the next function to join our unit.

I’m excited about the change, and I look forward to a renewed effort on policy, from the vantage point of institutional risk.  Already, I have begun meeting with the office of risk management to chat about creating “risk registers” and learn about how cooperation between the two areas will drive policy that is stronger, leaner, and more focused.

As you are developing or strengthening your policy process, and considering where the policy function properly belongs at your institution, what factors are the most important? Are you where you should be and, if not, how do you advocate for the policy function in the best interest of your institution? Unfortunately, I don’t have the “correct answers” to these questions; however, if we continue the dialogue, we will undoubtedly gain valuable knowledge together that will help us all achieve our professional goals.

Tags:  Collaboration  Governance  Policy Administration 

PermalinkComments (8)
 

Policy and Political Activism

Posted By Megan Jones, Metropolitan State University of Denver, Monday, January 21, 2019

Supporting Dreamer Students

Recently, I was interviewed by a graduate student in the College Student Services Administration Program at Oregon State University. Asked to write about an issue related to equality or civil rights on a college campus, the student chose to research Metropolitan State University of Denver’s decision to significantly lower tuition rates for undocumented students. The following Q & A is based on this interview.

Q: What was the beginning? What generated discussion about the need for lowering tuition for undocumented students? Were there any significant events that moved this idea forward?

A: MSU Denver primarily serves the Denver Metropolitan area—home to about 30% Hispanic or Latinx people. About 2010, MSU Denver leadership began seeking the Hispanic-serving designation to compete for federal funding to better support the university’s diverse student body. In 2018, for instance, MSU Denver students identified as 28.4% Latinx, 44.7% students of color and 49.1% first generation to college. When gathering data on current and prospective students, along with drawing from personal experience, MSU Denver leadership identified a population of students who struggle to access higher education due to their undocumented legal status. In 2012, evoking MSU Denver’s 1963 founding as a “College of Opportunity,” the Board of Trustees approved a discounted tuition rate for undocumented students and advocated for similar state legislation in the form of Advancing Students for a Stronger Tomorrow (ASSET). Former Deputy Provost Luis Torres, a passionate advocate for undocumented students’ rights, said that it was our responsibility to protect the most vulnerable parts of our population, and DREAMer students were it.

Q: Would you be able to break down some basics about the Dream Act, ASSET Bill, etc.?

A: The DREAM Act was introduced to the U.S. Senate in 2001, but it never passed. In a 2012 response, former President Barack Obama signed DACA, or Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals. DACA is an executive order that allows some individuals who were brought to the United States illegally as children to receive a renewable, two-year period of deferred action from deportation and to become eligible for a work permit in the U.S. While the DREAM Act ultimately failed, the moniker “DREAMers” stuck. ASSET is a Colorado law allowing state institutions of higher education operating in Colorado to offer reduced tuition rates to undocumented students who have completed a high school education in Colorado with several other stipulations. In 2017, President Trump challenged DACA and instead recommended a legislative solution in the form of a federal law. The PROSPER Act was introduced in the U.S. House of Representatives in December 2017, but stalled.

Q: What are you seeing at MSU Denver today as a result of efforts to support Dreamer students?

A: In addition to seeing hundreds of Dreamer students pursuing their educational goals, the sense of community that has been created to provide resources and support has heightened MSU Denver’s commitment to serving at-risk students. I often tell friends and family that I not only work on education policy, I work on civil rights policy. The social justice component of this work is a huge morale booster for students, faculty and staff, and has created a shared sense of pride and positive energy on campus.

Bloggers: Questions for further consideration—

How does your organization support Dreamer or other first-generation students? What additional info on this topic might be helpful? What policies or related resources does your organization have on advocacy, lobbying and political activity?

Tags:  Advocacy  ASSET  Civil Rights  DACA  DREAM Act  Dreamers  Social Justice 

PermalinkComments (0)
 

Policy Administration for the Digital Age

Posted By Jennifer Gallagher, Utah Valley University, Monday, December 17, 2018

Using Technology and Automation to Augment Your Policy Process

When I was an editing student in college, an older professor asked me to proofread a nonfiction book he had authored and get it ready for publication. He emailed me his files and a letter from his publisher that outlined their style guide, and mentioned that the publisher had rejected the files in their current state because of “formatting incompatibilities.” I didn’t know just what they meant until I attempted to format the document myself and noticed a host of bizarre issues: certain passages were locked, fonts and margins were inconsistent from page to page, and some paragraphs had collapsed entirely upon themselves into a single jumbled line of incomprehensible text. The most frustrating part was the more I attempted to fix the formatting through the normal Word interface, the more issues and problems it would introduce.  

So how does this apply to what we do in policy and the vastly unique roles of our individual policy offices? Little did I know (but would quickly learn), that underneath the text we see on a digital screen is an extensive web of coded language that instructs the program how to respond to a user’s inputted action (keystroke, voice, touch, etc.). This code can act in unwanted ways when a user inadvertently introduces invisible instructions to the program (usually through formatting marks, bookmarks, styles, etc.). In the case of my professor, he had unknowingly used some formatting options that had left invisible, residual coded marks after the original text was deleted in earlier drafts. By exposing these marks through advanced formatting options in Word and then eliminating them through the outline view, I was able to fix the coding issues. This was the moment I learned that Word is so much more than a word processor; that it, and other Microsoft Office products (Excel, Publisher, OneNote, OneDrive, etc.), contain a pre-coded network of untapped potential for application, productivity, and automation solutions that most casual users never know is even there. And with a little instruction, these and other programs that we already use can be customized and applied in individualized ways to solve the unique demands of our offices.

For example, my position in my university’s Policy Office involves editing policy drafts and completing research for policy writers. These writers, while incredibly intelligent subject-matter experts in their field, come with varying levels of technological proficiency. When I first started, I would email out our university’s template files for policy drafts, summaries, comments, etc. to writers, and what I would get back would sometimes be barely recognizable as our own template. A lot of my time was spent fixing accidental formatting errors caused by inexperienced users, multiple authors/drafts, or general human error: fixing fonts, sizes, and margins; moving stray lines and logos back where they belong; and just generally enforcing our university’s style guide (e.g., fixing section numbers, alphabetizing). All manual, repetitive, and tedious—but necessary—tasks.

Through a little Googling and dabbling in some of the advanced capabilities and developer options of Word (VBA), I was able to create a template that does not allow a writer to do anything I don’t want them to and automates the stuff I don’t want to do. The design is locked down. The styles, locked. The numbering and alphabetizing is all automated and customized to our style guide. They cannot misnumber a section; my template won’t let them. They cannot move, alter, erase, or change anything other than the sections they need to. And that was just template version 1. Using that template, I am currently creating a custom UserForm app (all through Microsoft Word using its existing features as intended) that will automate all the templates that we use in our office. Upon completion, a writer will be able to simply fill in the UserForm fields and submit, and the template will be generated and auto-populate with their answers.

The above is just one example out of the countless customizable solutions that anyone can create with just a little advanced insight and know-how. By understanding and harnessing the full capabilities of these programs, advanced users easily automate repetitive tasks, eliminate user error, increase efficiency and productivity, seamlessly enforce institutional standards and styles, and create better, cleaner documents and spreadsheets that enhance their policy and research processes.

The purpose of this post then is to gauge interest for a reoccurring segment on the Policy Matters blog (alongside its other fabulous editorial content) that that will educate interested ACUPA members on different ways they can optimize their own policy process by creating simple solutions customized to the unique needs of their office. This segment would consist of short, beginner-friendly tricks and tips for utilizing the popular office programs that we already own and use to their full potential, tailored to a policy administration environment.

Now, I’d like to hear from you. Do you think this information might be helpful or applicable in you and your office’s functions and roles? What unique administrative challenges do you face that you would like to find solutions for (anything, seriously!). Is there anything else in particular you would like this segment to cover?

Tags:  How-to  Jennifer Gallagher  Policy Tech  Productivity 

PermalinkComments (14)
 
Page 10 of 11
 |<   <<   <  5  |  6  |  7  |  8  |  9  |  10  |  11